Okay-- here we go!
This is one of those parenting decisions that I really don't care too much one way or another about what you do for your child. I feel like "right" for your family could be different from "right" for our family.
However, I am going to give you
our decision and
our reasons for doing what we did.
We did not have our boys circumcised.
Here's the reasons we came to that decision:
MEDICAL REASONSFirst, as I mentioned last week, our family has chosen the American Academy of Pediatrics as
somewhat of a medical "authority." So the first place we looked to when we were making this decision, was the
AAP. Here's a link to their thoughts--
http://www.aap.org/publiced/BR_Circumcision.htmHere's the breakdown of what they say--
"Scientific studies show some medical benefits of circumcision. However, these benefits are not sufficient for the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to recommend that all infant boys be circumcised."
You can click on that link to see the medical "benefits" (all of which are "slightly" smaller risks of contracting certain illnesses/infections).
Also listed on the
AAP's site is many of the reasons parents choose NOT to circumcise-- medical "risks" that are also rare, but include complications like bleeding, infection, improper healing, and botched circumcisions, causing the foreskin being cut too long or short...
So with all of that in mind, we felt like from a MEDICAL standpoint, it was pretty much a wash. Yes, there were some slight increased "risks" of not circumcising, but that was definitely outweighed by the chance of complications. Our pediatrician agreed. He said he saw "no medical reason to do it."
So from medical standpoint it became a no-
brainer for us. If there is no medical reason to do it, why would we "elect" to make our son have surgery?
FINANCIAL
Not getting circumcised is definitely cheaper than getting circumcised. Now, some might argue that it's not any more expensive because of insurance, but I would disagree. It costs SOMEONE that money-- and with the cost of health insurance these days (DON'T GET ME GOING), you could probably argue that "elective" surgeries maybe should not be covered.
It seemed like it was not worth the money because of the above, medical reason.
SOCIAL
Here
is where things get tricky. Now, this MAY be where some people get offended. Let me just reiterate, this is our OPINION on this, for OUR sons. Please post your opinions as well.
The thing I hear from a lot of people is this-- "We just thought he should "match" his father."
Let me respectfully say, I think that's kind of silly. Here's why-- Does a
pre-pubescent penis really "match" an adult penis? Um, no. Not even close. There are A LOT of differences-- things which really wouldn't be appropriate to list out, but I think you probably understand what I am getting at. Is circumcision REALLY going to be the thing that makes them "match" at that point? And while I am not a man, I would *think* that once a boy hits puberty and begins to go through the physical changes that would make him "match" dad, it probably isn't even in the BACK of his mind to think about his dad's foreskin, or lack thereof.
Another "social" reason we chose not to circumcise is probably something else that will make some people uncomfortable, but hey, this is Hot Topic Tuesday and this is a medical issue, so let's all just be mature. Many people believe that circumcising affects sex later in life, as it makes the tip of the penis less sensitive. When we were researching this topic before making our decision (which we made before
Nia was born since we did not know whether she was a boy or girl), I read a lot about it. And I remember reading a story of a man who was circumcised as an adult for medical reasons, and how he said that after the initial few weeks, he had a definite decrease in sensitivity, and ensuing sexual problems. Now, I know that this is the FARTHEST thing from a mom's mind. But lets just be honest, we were created as sexual creatures. It is my OPINION, that I should not be making "elective" decisions for my boys that might somehow compromise their sexual function at a later date. Some go so far as to consider it "genital mutilation" and a human rights violation... I don't know about all that, but I do think it's a decision over which my sons should have a say.
The whole "locker room" reason for circumcising also doesn't hold water to me, as it's almost 50/50 in the us. (I recently read that in 2004, about 57% of boys were circumcised in America-- but it was dropping at a rapid rate.)
One more "social" issue with circumcision-- something we haven't really fully developed in our brains yet but... we felt that circumcising Nico after his adoption could really stand to hamper his attachment to us. Again, this is OUR opinion-- please do not think we are judging anyone or their decision. This is how we felt about OUR son. We thought he was old enough that he might remember, but even if he didn't we were concerned of how it would affect him at a
subconscious level. We didn't see how a painful, elective procedure could stand to help this process of him feeling safe with us. We were also worried about how (later,
subconsciously) this would affect his feelings about his body and us accepting him just as he was. Just some thoughts that made sense to us...
The final "social" reason we considered with circumcising was religion. I can definitely see an Orthodox Jew electing circumcision-- I totally respect that. I am not Jewish, and I don't believe you could convince me that following Jesus (who was a Jew) means you need to be circumcised. When God made boys, he made them with foreskins. I don't believe it was a design flaw. That's pretty much the extent of theology that played into our decision. There are a lot of people who are apparently pretty militant about this, claiming that that circumcision was an outward sign associated with slavery-- being "cut off" from God. I don't know about all that either...
So there's our reasons.
If we ever needed to circumcise our boys for medical reasons, then yeah, by all means, we'd be all over it. If our boys ever expressed a strong desire to have it done, then yes, we would allow them to do it.
The bottom line is this-- this is something that they can always do later if they wanted/needed it to be done, but it cannot be
UNdone.
Your turn-- what do you think?